Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1357

reference
308-tree-1
name
1357
tree-preservation-order

undefined

308-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026459 50.893528)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026331 50.893514,-1.026337 50.893539,-1.026354 50.893562,-1.026382 50.893580,-1.026418 50.893592,-1.026457 50.893596,-1.026497 50.893593,-1.026533 50.893581,-1.026561 50.893564,-1.026580 50.893541,-1.026587 50.893516,-1.026581 50.893491,-1.026563 50.893469,-1.026535 50.893450,-1.026500 50.893439,-1.026461 50.893434,-1.026421 50.893438,-1.026385 50.893449,-1.026356 50.893467,-1.026338 50.893489,-1.026331 50.893514)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL